PTSD: Post Traumatic Sex Disorder

2010-03-10 – 17:31

Because I apparently have to stop working every 15 minutes to check blogs and social networking, I found myself reading about an ex-sex-worker coming out in an interview about her experiences. The write-up was on Bust.com and the writer  opened with her abhorrence at the interviewer’s ignorance, who took the typical talk-show “oh my god, people do whaaat” naivety + silent shaming approach.

Pretty typical sex-positive “the media sux” fare so far, but then the writer laid this one on us “We are expected to cheer The Good Sex Workers on because they are subverting paradigms and confounding out expectations of what a stripper is. But while the media loves this story,  it marginalizes all of the women who aren’t doing sex work to put themselves through college, or to pay for art supplies. The women of color and trans women and men who are forced into prostitution or who “choose” it because of a lack of other options. I feel like the more I read and hear about privileged women who really did chose to become sex workers, the more invisible those who didn’t have such a clear choice become.”

Wow, now this was a conversation I could get behind. Er, not that I am going to, because I think that the same white, privileged women theorizing over sex-work could be seen as part of the problem. Also being an anarchist, I am not going to prescribe the easy “prostitution should be legalized” tripe, which is what I think the Bust writer was going for.

But her point, which I think was an excellent one, brought another topic to mind. I was thinking of how the writers words “forced into”  could also account for women who were sexually abused and unconsciously re-playing their trauma through sex work. In this era of the feminist-sex-worker and the end of ” the courage to heal” feminism (thanks to the so called “false memory” foundation) statistics about abuse and trauma in sex workers have also become not PC or okay to focus on either.

Which brought me to something I read recently from a pro-kink, BDSM-activist. This activist was saying that people need to really give up the question of whether or not people with kinks are re-playing childhood trauma. Their stance was along the lines of, “some children who are spanked grow up to have spanking fetishes, some children who were seldom spanked grow up to have spanking fetishes and some children who were never spanked grow up to have spanking fetishes.” Therefore, this person suggested,’ so what? Stop focusing on whether or not trauma is involved.’

It seems this speaker is caught up in the stigma that comes with child abuse and scared that their sexuality won’t be seen as legitimate if it can be traced to psychological damage. But to spout this idea to your own community is to spread poison. I do agree that yeah, so what, if the person with the kink in question has already done the psychological work on themselves and knows the answers as to why. But if they haven’t, then this is an issue that does need discussed, it is a big deal.

Everyone has a responsibility to their unconscious actions, it really is common knowledge that what is not processed will get repeated. Often, it seems that this unconscious reaction only effects you, as adults we are the only ones responsible for our own happiness, health and success.  However, sex is often not solo. Not only could one potentially hurt themselves by re-living hidden traumas but putting a partner into an abuser role (unconscious or not) can be very damaging.

Discovering that your sexuality is re-playing on old wounds doesn’t necessarily mean it must stop. It means psychologically unhealthy practices should stop. The sexual arena is one that operates in the unconscious and for some, working on the past through sex might be a form of healing, others may need to abstain from sex entirely. That is only up to the person in the healing position (and their therapist) to decide. So to the kink activist, yes you can explore the question of whether or not your past shaped your kink and still have a healthy kinky sexuality. In fact, exploring is the only way to a healthy sexuality of any shade.

I don’t think that just those outside “the norm” need to question their sexuality. Rather, I think that being sexually healthy means honest reflection and questioning  no matter what your past or present bedroom looks like.  While it is sometimes used as one, sex positivity is never an excuse to not examine your past, and healthy sexuality can only come from self-exploration.


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Feature | Tagged , | Comments (3)

Masculinity in Leather

2010-03-10 – 13:59

I forgot to tell you, I wrote a piece awhile ago for Sexis about the history of the gay-leather scene.

“It’s nothing new, but straight men have been slowly getting more in touch with their feminine sides, in ways both emotional and aesthetic. And while that’s not at all a bad thing, I like to think that masculinity is just as beautiful, legitimate and valuable as femininity. I love masculinity. I love the culture of men being men, being gentlemen: the clothes, the haircuts, the strength in competitiveness, independence, ambition and assertiveness. I want to celebrate the best of masculinity, but it’s just not in vogue right now.

When talking about the feminization of men in culture, fingers are often pointed at the metrosexual trend, and some vague stereotype of an effeminate gay man masterminding it all. Actually, as gay culture gains a greater foothold in society, it seems to be given accord largely through this feminized stereotype. And while femme gays may garner more attention, gay culture has rich roots in masculinity that is rarely spoken of. Perhaps uncovering this dusty history could allow for a broader and more accepted celebration of all men?”

Read the entire article here


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Blurb | Comments (0)

The Hook-Up Culture & Honesty

2010-03-05 – 16:36

Just as I was writing my post about the hook-up culture and death of dating as our Grandparents knew it, the feminist blog-sphere was being lit up. In this corner of the Internet the old argument “is the hook-up generation bad for girls?” had been dug up from the bin of tossed around ideas, like a discarded dress with shoulder-pads finding itself once again trendy.

Dusting off the question–which is usually favored by conservatives shaming the pro-sex third wave– was an unusually fresh “girl’s expert” Rachel Simmons who writes advice for TeenVogue.  Basically her argument was that during this era of easy hook-ups and birth control pills, girls are being expected to be casual and cool about relationships And that the ball is in the dude’s court on to be bf-gf or not to be. The girls are then left with bated breath, hoping that he will ask. So pretty much the same old story we’ve been fed throughout generations. Only this time they are engaging in blowjobs before he asks her to the prom and she comes down the stairs in slow-motion with a make-over.

Rachel’s thing is that this is detrimental to girls because all of the power lies in the guys court. I would be lying if I didn’t acknowledge that this does happen and that it is a product of patriarch and not so good.  But Rachel  falls into the trap of pining a bit too much over the courting rituals of old. If the hook-up culture is rooted in patriarchy, old style courting was buried in it. I don’t need to point out how the same thread of sexism that ran through dating and has trickled down into the hook-up culture. Kate Harding already explained it on Salon more swiftly and gracefully then i ever could.

What does get old for me in Harding’s argument though are the many assertions of how the patriarchy hurts women in dating. Don’t get me wrong, I think it is sad that some women let men decide for them when and if they will date. And shockingly sad that women’s magazines and self help books have us ruminating over being perfect for a man. But the patriarchy hurts everyone and the male version of “10 ways to keep a man” is the “how to  impress a girl by saying/doing douchey stuff” ala Maxim/Mystery. Both are products of the patriarchy and I’d rather pluck out my eyelashes then read articles on either. But both men and women are hurting here.

What is needed is for men and women to learn honest communication, with themselves and with each other. And if you read my piece on how feminism changed dating, you can probably guess my answer. While the sexual revolution and feminism have erased the old rules, we are still knee-jerking our way through fucking and loving with the old sexist positions. Instead of guessing and hemming and hawing over what each other think, the new relationship needs to be one based on honesty. The advice Rachel Simmons needs to give her TeenVogue readers is to simply start being honest. First honest with themselves about whether or not they truly want a relationship (or if it just seems like the right thing to do.) And second, to start being radically honest with their partners about what they want.

Because that is how we are going to change this. It isn’t going to be about “teaching boys to be more respectful of girls” as she suggests, because really that is not the issue here. It isn’t an issue of conscious disrespect, but rather of playing a silent game and boys and girls being expected to take certain positions within that game. The issue here is that these kids are not talking about the relationships they are in. And let’s be honest,  it is not just kids doing this.

Now, back to that question that the TeenVogue readers should first ask themselves, “do I really want a relationship?”  Where this gets sticky is in the conditioning on how to feel about hook-ups and  boyfriends. Girl-Drive sums this up beautifully in her post on the matter “If we’re told that casual sex is unfulfilling and that we’re going to want relationships, chances are we’ll end up wanting them. And why not? That’s what Seventeen, Glamour, and all my friends always told me.”

We should teach girls that they don’t have to justify their hook-ups to themselves. Further, hooking-up doesn’t mean you should or can have a relationship with someone, explore what you really want. Where I stand on this old “does the hook-up culture” hurt girls is that no, hooking up is fine, great even for some people.  I think it is so important for people in Simmons position to let everyone know that teenagers are sexual beings with a right to a sex life, and consensual sex of any kind is okay.

If I haven’t beaten this into your brain enough by now, it is not the hook-up culture hurting us, it is the tired game of non-honesty that is hurting girls–and boys.  Even without the old courtship rules, we are still blindly going through the patriarchal motions which positions the male to pop the big questions of commitment and then carry us off into the sunset. All genders need to be liberated from this game and unless we start having intentional relationships where we are honest with ourselves and each other, it won’t happen.


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Feature | Tagged | Comments (10)

How Feminism Has Changed Relationships

2010-03-04 – 08:20

I was in highschool during the turn of the millennium, it was a time when a classic-put down for my age group had suddenly become lost. Slut was a word that sounded powerful, that one might cut up from a magazine to proudly paste onto her decoupaged notebook, a word she might see emblazoned in rhinestones on a baby-tee, and stand in awe of. This was also a time of many hook-ups for my peers, we didn’t date, we “talked” which usually meant a few phone calls and some heavy petting. In college, it went from talking upfront to fucking upfront and it seemed everyone I knew had swapped fluids with one and other at some point. People still shacked up of course, but it was usually after a hook-up rather than picking- her-up for dinner and a movie.

Long dead are rules and etiquette and courting. The hook-up culture of one night whirlwinds, easy-to-get antibiotics and readily available contraception is in full swinging swing. And aside from the Christian Right, the lot of us are backing it with an enthusiastic ass-slap. Thanks to feminism, the aforementioned contraceptives, divorce forgoing taboo and later and later marriages all of this can happen. Pro-sex feminism has given us an era where the term “slut” is an endearing word among friends.

But with the old rules abolished, and no new ones in place are we progressing? Or as Charlotte Allen suggests in her article, The New Dating Game, have we simply removed the rules and de-evolutionized, entering back into the Paleolithic age of dating. Where, as she writes “the men drag the women by their hair back to the cave, and the women love every minute of it.”

The old model of dating is eliminated, yet we are still adhering to a stagnant system of relationships and marriage. The emotional and psychological positions therein are pre-feminist. This might have worked for Grandparents or our parents but our generation isn’t going to settle. Our generation wants  someone to grow with rather than just grow old with. We don’t want companionship, we want intimacy. The customs and systems are broken, and this shattering of patriarchal systems has allowed us to become more in touch with our biological nature. But I think something more is needed as we get in touch with those needs.

For some, as we throw outdated relationship mores through the window, what then hops in is non-monogamy To me, this is not a new model, but rather another product of the sexual revolution. Non-monogamy makes the human truth of being attracted to people no longer forbidden.  But for me, the biggest intrigue about non-monogamy is that it can eliminate cheating.

Non-monogamous people I’ve known often say that humans aren’t naturally monogamous, it is a social construct. This, as it turns out is true. From evolutionary psychology, we know that men are naturally non-monogamous. Their biological urge is to spread as much seed as they can, for a better chance at passing along genes. But it was also long believed that women were inherently monogamous, however, this is not exactly right. We now know that women are actually hypergamous by nature. Which means they are only with one partner at a time, but are always looking for a trade-up. A partner who will bring home a bigger boar, who has a bigger cave.

So, going back to that idea of non-monogamy being the new relationship style– and strictly speaking from a stand-point of biology– non-monogamy might be fine for male partners, but doesn’t suite women. Considering high divorce and decreasing marriage rates, hypergamy might actually be the current relationship mode– and another biological throwback and product of feminism. Swinging from one chemical rush of falling love to the next is one way to deal with a broken relationship structure. But thinking about it from a stand-point of our ever-increasing life-spans (and those scientists working to prove that we are going to start living to 500, any decade now) hypergamy does make a lot of sense.

But let’s be frank, this is just biology, it is great to be in touch with our biology but it can also be overcome. After-all, there are many women who enjoy polyamory, many men who don’t and a lot of women who don’t trade up.  But what I want to bring your attention to is not the question of overcoming these things, but the sad truth that we currently don’t have a common model of relationship, monogamous or non, that actually works. What we have is damaged, created under patriarchy for broken people. Doing away with the customs and sexual rules doesn’t  give a new, working foundation of how to relate emotionally and psychologically. No wonder we’ve decided, quite literally “fuck it.”

There no such thing as falling in love and never having to work on the relationship. The idea accepted by many psychologists  is that in relationships we are trying to heal old wounds and we marry an emotional replica of a parent so we can do this. Relationships then take a delicate hand of intentionality, curiosity, communication and self awareness toward yourself and your partner. It shouldn’t be about accepting or downplaying whatever emotional tug-of-war you are in (as it seems former generations have done) but working to dig deep inside and find what your personal pattern is, what you are re-playing and the unconscious role your partner fits into.

As we we get closer to our biological nature and shake off the shackles of ancient rituals and customs, the need for self realization and intentional relationships becomes stronger. This is an empowerment needed for all genders.  These cultures and customs worked for broken people with short lifespans but we need more, I want more for all of us.

art by anne taintor


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Feature | Tagged , | Comments (5)

Reflections on Graphic Sexual Horror

2010-02-19 – 10:29

Graphic Sexual Horror is a documentary film about the late, hardcore BDSM pornsite, insex.com. I recently had a chance to see this documentary with fellow writer, Arvan of Sex Gender Body, at the Leather Archives as part of the Sex Positive Film Series.

Check out my review & reflections on the film at Sex Gender Body.

One thing that my review touched on was the question of consent in sex-work:

“Yet my inner feminist, as laid back as she might be, did inevitably stir. One of the ex-models described her first set and explained that before coming into film, they are asked what they are willing to do or not do, and what they might be apprehensive about. This model had never had anal sex, and was clearly apprehensive about doing so. On her first shoot, PD broke that boundary. As she laid tied up, ass up on the floor, he penetrated her anally with a nearly baseball-bat sized instrument. She went onto say that although she hadn’t used her safeword, she felt like she had been raped.

When this was brought up during the discussion after the film, a woman who had been invited on stage because she had once done a session herself with PD said, “she said she felt like she was raped, it’s not the same thing as being raped.” I agree it is not the same thing, but I don’t think it is the opposite of rape either. I don’t think consent is a yes-no/black-white issue. What it seemed the model was explaining is a tight-rope walk of that delicate, fuzzy line of consent.”

What I didn’t go on to say in this review is that this is a sticky subject.  I have said in the past that what I do define as the opposite of rape is enthusiastic consent. When pay instead of pleasure is on the enthusiasm end, where do the gray areas of consent fit in? After-all, any job has things that one will not be enthusiastic about doing. Additionally, there is a power-dynamic going on, as PD  is the model’s boss, as well as the dominant in the scene.

Ultimately, I think the line of consent is up for the person in the sexual position to decide, if this woman is questioning being raped, I don’t think it can be anyone’s place but her own to decide. However, in gray areas of consent I don’t think that “rape” is a blame to put fully on one partner as the perpetrator, but as somewhat a reflection on both partners who didn’t pay attention or communicate about those blurred lines. I’m not saying one who does not have the tools to express non-consent should ever be blamed, but I think a society that doesn’t teach us how to effectively communicate what we feel in the moment, should.

Read my review on the film here.


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Uncategorized | Comments (3)

Safewords vs. Communication

2010-02-19 – 09:40

The first time I had anal sex, it was a decision made out of the self-assertion that I was open minded and adventurous in bed. The whole dialogue that influenced this decision was entirely in my mind. When this partner suggested anal, I wanted to do it do it for him—and after a mini frenzy of internal questions, gave a nodded consent. As I gripped a pillow, the words “most painful sex I’ve ever had” ran through my mind. Although there were parts of the sex I enjoyed, much of what I liked was this mental hurdle I had set, overcoming fear and pain and proving to my partner that I was willing to do this, for him.

This is not the first or only time I’ve put my own comfort aside for the sake of my sexual prowess or simply, my partner’s enjoyment. My inner feminist could argue that is a product of the patriarchy, that women are raised to accommodate the needs of everyone around them first. However, I also have a sneaking suspicion that men have done this too.

This grinning and bearing for a partner also brings up the issue of consent. Doing things we kind of don’t want to for our partners can be okay, even a turn-on and shouldn’t necessarily be associated with non-consent. However, this can also slip into those gray areas of consent, crossing unspoken lines. It is ultimately up to the person in the sexual act to decide what they feel okay with, but there also lies a responsibility to communicate a lack of consent. Sadly, in most relationships there isn’t a safeword. And in my experience, safewords get used only in urgent situations, potentially masking an element of communication. Further, many of us are so out of touch with our emotions or how to express them that traveling into these gray areas  feels out of our control.

Talking during sex is somewhat of a taboo. There is a non-spoken idea that talking would be sort of embarrassing, breaking the mood or ruining the flow. What ends up happening is that during sex we are so much in our own heads, only able to guess what our partner is thinking/feeling.  And to many of us, sex is this non-verbal, animal-dance.

Dirty-talk can make it just as hard to actually address emotions and lines of consent that come up in the moment, if not harder than in non-verbal sex. Talking dirty is all about upping your sexual prowess; it is peacocking one’s sexual bravado. Breaking this bedroom persona is often harder and more taboo than just breaking a panting silence.

Sex-talk outside of the bedroom can also fall prey to a similar pattern. As someone who has long considered myself open about sex, I have been guilty here. When talking about sex in a social situation, I’ve come to realize that what I lend is my own sexual sophistication, things I know, things I am sure about, my own desires and past adventures. I self-censor about my fears, doubts and areas where I am unsure, self conscious or just closed off.

Appearing sexually naive or worse, closed minded becomes the taboo with sex-positive, sexually outgoing individuals and what gets erased are the actual open and honest dialogues, the real trials and tribulations that we all go through. This maintains a ridiculous idea that the only people who have sexual questions, doubts or problems are ones who are simply not as evolved and have more growing to do.

Don’t get me wrong, I do write about sex for a reason. I think that sexual disclosure can be a very therapeutic and positive thing. This act of self-disclosure is not meant to be a ‘look at me’, masturbatory ruse, but rather an act of self exploration in which one can unearth new things about themselves, learning that personal sexuality is at once unique and  part of a shared human experience. This can also be used as a starting point to begin opening up, for people who don’t talk in bed.

It can be easy to start a dialogue about things you have thought about and are fairly comfortable with, yet much less easy in the heat of the moment, mid-anxiety and mid-sex, to say what is going on inside. This takes a whole different set of skills. It begins with honesty, with being in-the-moment with yourself and learning to identifying your own emotions.

Dr. Laura Bergman had an exercise on her sex-therapy show that I think helps here. One partner lays down, while the other manually stimulates them. The receiving partner continually shares where they are on an arousal scale (from 1-10.) The idea is for the receiving partner to be able to control their arousal — and not come to orgasm — by verbally communicating it to the giving. This helps shake you out of your own head during sex, giving your partner an idea what is going on for you emotionally and psychologically.

I can’t help but think, what if that first time I had anal sex, my partner and I had used this number system to communicate  how intense it felt. I would have still had the rush of doing something for his pleasure, proving that I could take it, but I don’t think teeth marks would have been left in the sheets or that my anus would still tense up, just thinking about it.

Sometimes, we do things in bed purely for the sake of our partner, sometimes those things are uncomfortable. I’ve been penetrated in ways that I didn’t enjoy, or barred pain that wasn’t turning me on at the expense of the sex, to accommodate my partner, and I even sometimes enjoyed doing that. The important thing is to be open enough with yourself to know what it is you are thinking, feeling and are comfortable with in the moment, to identify these things so you can speak up when that fuzzy-line is straddled.


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Feature | Tagged | Comments (2)

Ask Rabbit: Sharing Sexual Desires & Needs

2010-02-04 – 09:41


Dear Rabbit White,

My boyfriend and I have been in a relationship for the past three years and recently moved in together. There is a five year age gap between us (he’s older).

When we first started dating, he had very little sexual experience and it was incredible fun to have sex with someone who didn’t have an already formed set of ideas about how their sex life with another person should be. He was open to having fun and exploring my sexual desires, needs and fantasies for the last three years. I have tried to satisfy and explore his sexuality but he refuses to share his needs with me.

I have tried discussing his fantasies with him and have often gotten the reply of ‘I don’t have any’ or ‘I don’t want to share mine with you’. Even then, when we are having sex, if I ask him what he would like, he always responds with suggestions which focus on my pleasure rather than his. While it is nice that he does focus on my orgasm, it also makes me feel really bad. To me, sex should be about taking and giving, and most importantly about sharing.

It has gotten to the point where I now am actually arguing with him about it because an important part of my sexuality is that I want to be able to please my sexual partner and being quite frank, I’m starting to run out of ideas to our sex life fresh. I know I shouldn’t argue with him about it but it’s just so frustrating to feel that your partner feels they can’t open up to you or that they don’t want to open up to you.

So I was wondering if you could shed some light on this issue for me.

Is it normal (I know that’s a pretty relative term in sexuality) for someone not to have any fantasies or to not want to share their fantasies?

How can I relate to him about my need to also satisfy him and my desire to also build an intimate relationship around sharing both our sexual desires?

Hope you can help,
D

Dear D,

I think your letter shows a huge amount of care and empathy about your significant other. Because of this, I am sure that with a little relationship work, this sexual part of your relationship will go far. So let’s address what you are dealing with, this is a personal issue of his.  Yet, it becomes an issue for you and I can totally see where this would be frustrating and upsetting on your end.

Before you can move forward with his issue, your own frustration must be addressed. If you hide it, it will inevitably bubble over into resentment, but if you don’t fully explore it, it will keep coming up when you try to talk about his experiences/feelings. You have every right to your feelings too, whether you are pissed, hurt, scared or whatever. Try journaling and focusing on the different parts that come up, perhaps linking to another time you felt this way.

Where you might be now is  in a cycle, when you press him about his fantasies, he shoots even further back inside. It becomes a dance, he pulls in, you react, he pulls in further, you react more. Stuck. It is time to stop this cycle.

There is something else that often happens when we get into these cyclical arguments, I’ll call it “the crunch.” This is the worst -case scenario idea that you have about your partner, the most extreme (negative) ideas of what they are really like.  When we are put into a “crunch” situation, this worst-case scenario is often highlighted. When you do finally talk to him about this issue, make sure it is not from “the crunch” fear but rather from a place of love, curiosity and empathy for your partner. I think that becoming comfortable with your own feelings and understanding how the cycle triggers you will help you to do this.

When you are in that place, ask him to talk. Take some deep breaths, tell him that you love him and then go.  Start by explaining the facts,these are the things that could be picked up by a video camera. Ex: “When we talk about fantasies, you don’t say anything and seem to shut off.” Next, bring up how you interpret that. Ex: “When you do that I interpret it as that you are uncomfortable with me and question whether or not you can trust talking with me about sex.” Next explain how that makes you feel. Ex: “That makes me feel lonely and scared about our sex life.”

After you’ve said your part, open the conversation up to him– about what he feels. When he begins to talk try to only use active-listening, rather than advice giving or weighing in on how you feel again. Active listening involves listening to the speaker, and repeating what they’ve said back to them. It is reflecting that you understand what they’ve said and clarifying the emotion behind their statement.  Here are some sites that further explain active listening: 1 , 2,  3

Active Listening Ex:

You: I sense that you pulled away just now.

Him: *Sounds sad* Mhmm…

You: You seem upset about that?

Him: *Arms crossed* I’m not upset, I just don’t know why we have to talk about it…

You:  (Clarifying) So you don’t want to talk about it…That is frustrating?

Him: Yeah it is. It’s more like I feel, anxious..

You: (Clarifiying with Emapthy) You feel anxious.

Him: Like my heart is going to explode.

You: (Confirming) That sounds scary.

Keep actively listening until he seems done talking. Eventually, as this topic becomes more comfortable and he wants to explore the issue, you might help guide him inward while using active listening. When he expresses a deep emotion, it might be appropriate to ask “Do you remember another time you felt this way?” or “Tell me more about that emotion/experience” or “what are you feeling now?”

Employing active-listening  will not be a band-aid on the situation. It often feels counter-intuitive to talk this way and learning to do it is hard work.

A  lighter idea here is that you might want to simply start talking about sex,  using the word in a context outside your own bedroom.  Talk about sex as a general topic,explore sex-positive topics. Try bringing up something you’ve read that sparks you (maybe one of my blog-posts) and open up conversation about ideas and feelings on the topic. This might help you explore the issue when it isn’t so heavy.

Wishing you the best, D. Thanks so much for writing!



rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Weekly | Tagged | Comments (0)

Jilling Off

2010-01-29 – 09:18

There is something in the past of my relationship that I’m not proud about, but I’ll go ahead and say it: I used to feel a tinge of jealousy when Ned would masturbate. It wasn’t full on anger, or even conscious envy, but it was there. Of course I could come up with a million reasons why: maybe I just missed him and wanted to be involved in the sexual act, maybe it was low self-esteem, comparing myself to women in the porn he consumed, maybe I felt that he chose masturbation over sex with me. But, I tend to think that when jealousy arises from seemingly nothing, it is best to look inside. In order to understand why I felt threatened by Ned’s relationship with his right hand, I would need to look at the relationship with my own.

It wouldn’t be easy to see my problems. I considered myself pro-sex, pro-porn and I masturbated quite frequently, I talked about it openly. Yet during my masturbation sessions, I didn’t use porn and I often wouldn’t even fantasize, just holding the vibrator to my clit on high, eyes squeezed tight until I would come. It would only take about a minute and if it started to take longer I would begin to feel uncomfortable. There was a disconnect between sexuality and masturbation.

I discovered masturbation at about age nine. I was at a slumber-party, laying on the floor when I found if I pressed and unpressed my thighs together in a specific way, incredible feelings ran through me. I did feel weird, a bit guilty. The only other thing I remember ascribing to it was that it felt tender and uniquely female. It was similar to the feeling  I would later have when I first realized I was growing breasts. I was riding my bike when I went over a bump and felt a tiny jiggle in my shirt. I rode over and over the bump, awed with feeling privately lit-up.

I didn’t realize that what I did with my thighs was masturbation, much less even linked to my vagina, until high school. When I realized this, I had still never “masturbated.” In junior high, boys started talking about jerking off and that was okay–we knew all boys did it. But when we girls talked about masturbation amongst each other it was with the idea that it was just weird and gross. I remember at some point when I was a teenager, my mother made it her mission to let my friends and I know that everyone masturbates. I suppose this was her idea of telling me it was okay… but it proved to be more awkward than anything, as she’d proclaim her statement with a raised wine glass at the dinner-table.

I got my first vibrator when I was 17. My best friend was in town from Tennessee and  while I was at school she and my 21-year-old boyfriend went to the mall to amuse themselves. “We got you a present” they said, presenting me with a retro looking  tin lunch box. “Cute!” I exclaimed and opened it to find a large pink plastic vibrator spill out, like an exclamation point dropped on the floor.  It had been stolen from Spencers, taken out of the box it was packaged in and hidden it in my ex’s pants.

I don’t remember really fantasizing then either, but just experimenting at night (with music turned up loud) as to how many times this thing could get me off.  But I do remember having a reoccurring nightmare where the whole family would be in the kitchen having breakfast when someone would mention how they had trouble sleeping because of how loud I’d been with my lawn-mower of a vibrator.

So, I would eventually move on from the weed wacker vibe (I now swear by the silent, plug-into-the-wall guys) and also  eventually, finally move on from grinning and bearing masturbation in order to get off. Going through massive self work and therapy, I’ve become more comfortable with myself and found more comfort in my sexual skin too. I recently read that inside every sexual-extrovert lies a prude trying to hide their prudishness. While those who knew me in college would swear I was no prude, I know that my inner-Victorian hid in self stimulation.

I realized that masturbation held fear for me, being alone with myself and my sexuality was somewhat scary. As I began to let go and let my mind wander, enjoying my body I was shocked to find that I was really into the whole fantasy thing. The world of fantasy is like meditation or dream-scape, a place where the unconscious can uncoil and get worked out. It is another key to your psyche and I think it takes courage to really let that go, to not judge or become fearful of what you find. I think of it as finally being “eyes open” to my sexuality, where I had been either blinded or refusing to see.

I would be lying if I said that all of this is just a piece of cake now. I still have a hard time being comfortable with slow self stimulation and exploring myself, but my eyes are open. I want to be comfortable in my skin, with my sexuality.  And I am coming to that point, slowly working my way, panting  up the path.


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Feature | Tagged | Comments (7)

God=You

2010-01-28 – 08:36

Part 1

Part 2

I wanted to share this set of videos, because it is one of the most exciting conversations I have come across in awhile. I’ve not seen something so beautiful and thoughtful on the topic of atheism and de-conversion in, well, maybe ever.

While other atheist memes are quick to point a finger, laughing at “silly christians” this video set manages to bring real reverence and empathy to the topic. “God” is very personal, and I think the topic deserves this level of respect.

My own experience with de-conversion is very different from the author’s. I’m not sure precisely when my own faith in christianity was lost, but it was long ago. I didn’t have to wrestle with bible verses or Jesus, but rather the concept of God and spirituality.

I do consider myself to be a very spiritual atheist, and that is because I know this feeling of “God” hasn’t gone anywhere, the answers to prayers, the guidance, feeling healed and forgiven, these are all things inside of me. They are what many psychologists would call “the self.” I was happy that the author of the video covered this, and did it so well.

God=You is something I find myself coming to time and time again, when talking with mystics or christians. I often find myself replacing  the word “God” for “my true self” in my head and it is often astounding how much more sense their point makes. Kind of like when people say “you” when they really mean “I” such as: “you go to work, you feel depressed.” When you hear someone do that, change it in your head to I, and you might be amazed at how much more true, telling and vulnerable their statement is.

God is you. It brings new meaning to Namaste: the God in me bows to the God in you.


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Weekly | Tagged | Comments (4)

Potential Parenting

2010-01-22 – 11:41

There is one very intense, meaningful question that every woman has to find an answer to: Would you keep the baby or not? This question found it’s way into my living room last night as Ned and I sat on the couch after a successful  budgeting discussion, we realized we were coming up on our yearly decision to the parenting/abortion question. Last year, we thought it might be best to decide ahead of time what we would do if I were to get pregnant, rather than make the huge decision in the emotional heat of the moment as strange, new hormones swam around my body. Whatever decision we came to with clear minds would be the one that applied all year. If I would have gotten pregnant last year, it would have meant a termination.

I felt relaxed and in a logical state of mind after our money-talk. Ned suggested we talk about the pregnancy issue soon, I thought why not now, and began to consider it. “Well it would still be termination” I said, thinking of how prepared I would want to be (and am not now) if I were to have a child.  But no sooner had I said it then my heart began to wrench. Ned caught the look on my face, “It is a lot harder now,” he said. A flux of emotions ran through me; Ned said we should talk when it wasn’t so late.

I’m undecided on whether or not I want to have children, ever. Being in my 20’s, I see peers who seem to be doing it out of some unconscious, personal desire to fill their own needs. To gain control, to have someone to love. Was the rush of emotions I felt about keeping or not keeping a curt-tail of my own selfish desires? Maybe, it was definitely something to explore. Whatever goes on unconsciously to bring a sudden, strong desire for a baby should be looked into, before making-a-human-being becomes the answer. I’m also not sure that there is a reason to have kids that isn’t a bit selfish — and maybe that is okay.

Yet, this isn’t what really upsets me; the problem I see is the vast un-preparedness and ignorance with which people jump into the role of parent. I remember talking about this topic with a friend once, when she said “Someonce once asked me ‘well, will you ever be *truly* ready?”  “Yes,” I replied for her. There is so much you can do to know what raising a child means, that does not involve any sort of “well I turned out okay” mentality.

I am undecided about whether or not I want children, but I am very interested in parenting and what that means for me as an adult, and what it meant for me as a child. From what I’ve studied on parenting, I strongly recommend: Parent Effectiveness Training and The Drama of The Gifted Child and online resources like No Spank, The Natural Child Project, Taking Children Seriously & Autonomy in the Family. I’ve worked hard on the relationship model I have with my husband and would work even harder on a parenting model. Before I could ever know whether or not I want a child, I need to know what it is going to take to raise one. Are you really going to learn all of this in the 9 months you are pregnant on top of learning basic childcare and doctors appointments?

By reading parenting books, I am not just learning how I would one day handle family disputes, I am reading to further understand the parenting model my parents had, that most parents have and how these models massively fail. This goes back to that brave and daunting task of truly acknowledging, processing and understanding what your parents mistakes were, so you can avoid the trap of forever repeating them.

At the heart of this is the fact that I am deeply concerned about the well-being of children, about the rights of children which are constantly ignored or trampled. I am a strong advocate of children’s rights. When I say I am against child abuse, I mean not only extreme cases of physical or sexual abuse, I also mean common emotional and psychological abuse and poor parenting methods like widely used permissive or authoritarian parenting, or the horrible inconsistent mix of both. The data about the effects of these types of parenting and abuse are out there, and it is visible in the adults you know. Damaged children become damaged adults who harm themselves or those around them.

I am unsure whether or not I will have children, and this is out of the utmost respect for them.


rw-post-sig

By Rabbit White | Posted in Feature | Tagged | Comments (10)