An article that was written a while ago has finally gone live! This piece is on foreskin restoration, a DIY technique to manually restore foreskin lost to circumcision.
“On the L in Chicago, an average thirty-something man sits quietly in his seat. Suddenly a little plastic ring falls out from his pant leg and rolls along the floor. There are thousands of men all over the country walking around secretly rigged up with devices in their pants—made of plastic, metal, tape and other items that yank the skin of the penis. And no, this isn’t some sexual fetish or kink.” CLICK to read the entire story!
Subscribe to my blog!
Subscribe to my podcast!Related posts:
4 Comments
The article is a little heavy on its treatment of the placebo effect. The restored skin may not be original equipment, but restoring is nonetheless very worthwhile. Restoring gives radically different feelings. Among them:
- the shaft can now be frictionlessly kneaded by the slinking of the skin, to prod some sense sites deep within the shaft near the glans and elsewhere. I never knew this was possible before I restored. I suppose with enough lube I might have discovered the same thing earlier before I had slack skin.
- the mucosal skin just below the glans down to the scar has a sort of ticklish “itch” that just sparkles during intercourse or oral stimulation. The area was dry and basically numb before.
- the corona and frenular area are just a lot more sensitive/ticklish now that they are covered all the time. Some have said it’s due to “dekeratinization” and others have said there’s no such thing. All I know is I feel A LOT more now. It’s like the nerve endings are closer to the surface, and the surface is more supple and delicate so it tracks better with the fine detail of whatever it’s touching. It’s like going from wearing 3 thick condoms to a single ultra-shear one. Anybody can experience the same change by wearing a band-aid continuously for several days on any part of their body. When you take it off, the part that had been covered is very sensitive and ticklish.
- the skin at the pucker of the prepuce is very ticklish to tongue flicking when it is bunched up. Since I didn’t have enough to bunch up before, I never felt this sensation.
- the inner foreskin is delightfully aware of a tongue plunged in between the glans and foreskin and swirled around (with skin drawn forward over the glans). Since I didn’t have enough slack before for this to happen, I never felt this sensation until I had slack.
- the shaft skin that has spent its whole day puckered in front of the glans gives off a wild sensation upon the onset of an erection. It’s like the skin crackles inside as it is forced to stretch wide enough to clear the glans and retract past it, while it also has to overcome the grip of the tacky clinging adhesion to the glans. It’s like both glans and skin are kissing each other. This is brief and I really only notice it for the first couple minutes of an erotic encounter, but that’s OK. If it kept up I’d probably climax too fast. I imagine this might be akin to what it feels like to have a vagina stretched out. I can only guess about that of course.
- the shaft skin that rolls up and down the shaft gives off a new feeling as it rolls over on itself from inner to outer and back. Since I never had enough slack before to feel the skin tightly rolling like this during arousal I never felt this sensation before.
- with the slack skin sufficient to easily cover my glans during arousal, my wife can rub my glans through the skin before intercourse while I’m licking her, and there is ZERO risk of her rubbing me to the point of numbness, no matter how long we keep at that activity. Before dry friction directly on my glans would really have a negative impact on the intercourse that followed.
- after my wife climaxes once during intercourse her vaginal chemistry seems to change to where there is suddenly more friction. Not a LOT more; just like the difference between lube that’s water-based and lube that’s oil-bsed. At that time, I often feel my penis move inside my sheath of skin only, with ZERO friction between me and her vaginal walls. She LOVES this, because she says at that moment she would be too sensitive for any friction. Because I never had slack before, she was never able to enjoy this plush filled-up frictionless massage feeling between orgasms before. Of course when we’re finally done, this same action causes her vagina to pull my skin so my glans is actually covered as I withdraw, which is a trip.
Sex wasn’t torture before. At age 38 my wife and I would make love for like 45 minutes or an hour. She would climax about 5 times and if I wanted to finish I needed to REALLY concentrate and she needed to break out the dirty talk and the stars needed to align. But she would be utterly rubbed raw and then want to take several days off from intimacy.
She never did succeed in finishing me orally before I restored.
Now whenever she’s had enough of intercourse I just let go and finish as she climaxes again with me. But the whole ride is so fulfilling, I’m in no rush to get to a big finish. We really connect, and have intercourse more often than ever.
Sex is very much better since restoration, for physical reasons. We’re both having the best sex of our lives after many years of marriage.
Foreskin restoration works!
I was circumcised at birth and never thought about it. But, as I got older I lost a lot of sensitivity in my penis and had a harder time staying hard and it took me longer and longer to ejaculate during sex. As soon as I learned about circumcision and foreskin restoration, I immediately began restoring my foreskin.
See http://www.RestoringForeskin.org and http://www.foreskin-restoration.net/forum to learn more about men who wish they had never been circumcised and are doing something about it.
I have partially restored my foreskin and life is good again. Sex is much better. I can stay erect as long as I want until I orgasm. My wife used to get sore from sex and we needed lubricant. Now, she does not get sore and we don’t need lubricant. We both enjoy sex a whole lot more.
First, to name genital cutting or genital mutilation as “circumcision” gives this unnecessary and harmful operation niceties with such a soft and sweet sounding word. To say “uncircumcised” does equally and with the double intent of needing “to be circumcised”. This says nothing of the true essence of the natural penis (the natural penis doesn’t need to be cut) so why bring this into the picture of nature’s perfection.
Second, enough restorers do not like the word “fauxskin” and so this may not be P.C..
Contrary to the article, the restoring foreskin by tensioning does not just bring the shaft skin forward but also replicates the skin remnant. That is it will grow inner mucosa and outer shaft skin and this should also include growing some sexual receptors from the erogenous frenulum remnant, if this and the mucosa have not been completely cut off. (Note the scientists of the African studies promoting circumcision are also now promoting cutting off all of the erogenous mucosa leaving just the 15% sexual receptors in the glans corona.) As it is, the typical American circumcision removes 65%-85% of the erogenous sexual receptors, average 75% of the penis is removed including all of the most sensitive tissue. (see Sorrells et al. “Fine-Touch Pressure Thresholds in the Adult Penis, 2007.) At some point in time, upon death, a restored foreskin will be investigated for grown sexual receptors.
It would seem Dr. Reed is describing surgical restoration not non-surgical. This type brings forward the shaft skin to cover and brings the scrotal onto the shaft by grafting that is numb. Foreskin restoration increases sensation in both breadth and depth.
And contrary to the American Academy of Family Physicians, for almost 900 years, circumcision has been know to be harmful, decreasing sensation, function, and pleasure, as detailed by Moses Maimonides, a Jewish philosopher and one of the greatest Torah scholars of the middle ages, 1135-1204. He makes no bones as to loss and harm.
I did like to add to the placebo effects of foreskin restoration. Upon being covered for the first time, universally men feel not naked for the first time while being nude.
I doubt that the inner foreskin can never be replaced.I have heard of hand transplants and doing a foreskin transplant would probably be much easier than that or a face transplant.